How the national numbers differ
1Logisticians has the edge on annual openings
Logisticians is at 26,600 annual openings, compared with 4,500 annual openings for Financial Examiners.
2Logisticians has the edge on projected growth
Logisticians is at 17.6% projected growth, compared with 9.3% projected growth for Financial Examiners.
3Financial Examiners has the edge on median pay
Financial Examiners is at $94,160, compared with $82,320 for Logisticians.
65.3/ 100Financial Examiners
vs
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Financial Examiners vs Logisticians
| Dimension | Financial Examiners | Logisticians |
| Median pay (2025) | $94,160 | $82,320 |
| Pay percentile | 78.8 percentile | 74.6 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | 9.3% | 17.6% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 4,500 | 26,600 |
| 2025 employment | 70,000 | 255,100 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree; More than 12 months of on-the-job training, in addition to any qualifying education or licensing | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | More than 12 months of on-the-job training, in addition to any qualifying education or licensing. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.