How the national numbers differ
1Industrial Engineer has the edge on projected growth
Industrial Engineer is at 12.4% projected growth, compared with 6.4% projected growth for Civil Engineer.
2National pay benchmarks are very similar.
Compare actual offers, expected paid hours, schedule, and benefits before treating either career as the higher-paying option.
3Industrial Engineer has the edge on annual openings
Industrial Engineer is at 23,100 annual openings, compared with 22,700 annual openings for Civil Engineer.
vs
77.1/ 100Industrial Engineer
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Civil Engineer vs Industrial Engineer
| Dimension | Civil Engineer | Industrial Engineer |
| Median pay (2025) | $100,840 | $102,440 |
| Pay percentile | 83.4 percentile | 84.5 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | 6.4% | 12.4% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 22,700 | 23,100 |
| 2025 employment | 380,600 | 365,100 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.