CFChooseField
Quick answer · Balanced priorities

Radiologic Technologist is the stronger fit

For balanced, Radiologic Technologist is the stronger data-backed choice because of annual openings and projected growth. Consider Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians instead if factors outside the available labor-market data matter more.

Compare the practical differences
What this means in practice

The facts most likely to affect your decision

Start with earnings, the route into the job, training, available openings, and a day-to-day reality.

Radiologic Technologist

Typical pay
$77,660
Route into the job
Associate's degree
Training
None
Openings each year
12,900
Know before you choose

Exposure to illness or infection is a recurring part of the work context, even when safety procedures are followed.

See the full Radiologic Technologist brief
Why the recommendation leans this way

Where Radiologic Technologist has the edge

1

Radiologic Technologist has the edge on annual openings

Radiologic Technologist is at 12,900 annual openings, compared with 3,800 annual openings for Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians.

2

Radiologic Technologist has the edge on projected growth

Radiologic Technologist is at 4.3% projected growth, compared with 3% projected growth for Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians.

3

Radiologic Technologist has the edge on median pay

Radiologic Technologist is at $77,660, compared with $67,260 for Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians.

4

Radiologic Technologist has the edge on job availability

Radiologic Technologist is at 228,000 jobs, compared with 64,700 jobs for Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians.

See scores, detailed data, and how the comparison works
53.2/ 100

Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians

vs
67.3/ 100

Radiologic Technologist

Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against all published careers in the ChooseField corpus. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 20%, job availability 10%, entry ease 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. The score is a decision aid based on national data, not a prediction or guarantee.

Detailed evidence

Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians vs Radiologic Technologist

DimensionCardiovascular Technologists and TechniciansRadiologic Technologist
Median pay$67,260$77,660
Pay percentile
Projected growth (2024–34)3%4.3%
Annual openings3,80012,900
2024 employment64,700228,000
Typical entry educationAssociate's degreeAssociate's degree
Preparation levelJob Zone 3Job Zone 3
Related work experienceNoneNone
On-the-job trainingNoneNone
Work-style patterndesk-orientedremote-friendly pattern
Work-life balance proxyModerateModerate
Physical demandsLowLow
People interactionHighHigh
Math intensityLowLow
Coding intensityLowLow
Remote-friendly patternModerateModerate

Work-style rows are derived from the stored O*NET occupation profile. The WLB and remote-friendly rows are heuristics, not employer-specific schedule or remote-job statistics. AI exposure is not scored until the corpus has a consistent measure.