How the national numbers differ
1Computer Hardware Engineer has the edge on median pay
Computer Hardware Engineer is at $161,740, compared with $134,960 for Aerospace Engineers.
2Computer Hardware Engineer has the edge on annual openings
Computer Hardware Engineer is at 4,100 annual openings, compared with 3,800 annual openings for Aerospace Engineers.
3Computer Hardware Engineer has the edge on projected growth
Computer Hardware Engineer is at 9.1% projected growth, compared with 8.3% projected growth for Aerospace Engineers.
67.9/ 100Aerospace Engineers
vs
69.8/ 100Computer Hardware Engineer
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Aerospace Engineers vs Computer Hardware Engineer
| Dimension | Aerospace Engineers | Computer Hardware Engineer |
| Median pay (2025) | $134,960 | $161,740 |
| Pay percentile | 93.2 percentile | 96 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | 8.3% | 9.1% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 3,800 | 4,100 |
| 2025 employment | 68,700 | 76,100 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.