How the national numbers differ
1Aerospace Engineers has the edge on projected growth
Aerospace Engineers is at 8.3% projected growth, compared with 0.4% projected growth for Nuclear Engineers.
2Aerospace Engineers has the edge on annual openings
Aerospace Engineers is at 3,800 annual openings, compared with 800 annual openings for Nuclear Engineers.
3National pay benchmarks are very similar.
Compare actual offers, expected paid hours, schedule, and benefits before treating either career as the higher-paying option.
67.9/ 100Aerospace Engineers
vs
43.8/ 100Nuclear Engineers
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Aerospace Engineers vs Nuclear Engineers
| Dimension | Aerospace Engineers | Nuclear Engineers |
| Median pay (2025) | $134,960 | $133,970 |
| Pay percentile | 93.2 percentile | 92.7 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | 8.3% | 0.4% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 3,800 | 800 |
| 2025 employment | 68,700 | 16,600 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.