How the national numbers differ
1Microbiologists has the edge on median pay
Microbiologists is at $87,990, compared with $73,010 for Conservation Scientists.
2Microbiologists has the edge on projected growth
Microbiologists is at 6.2% projected growth, compared with 5.3% projected growth for Conservation Scientists.
3Conservation Scientists has the edge on annual openings
Conservation Scientists is at 2,100 annual openings, compared with 1,500 annual openings for Microbiologists.
50.9/ 100Conservation Scientists
vs
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Conservation Scientists vs Microbiologists
| Dimension | Conservation Scientists | Microbiologists |
| Median pay (2025) | $73,010 | $87,990 |
| Pay percentile | 62.8 percentile | 76.6 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | 5.3% | 6.2% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 2,100 | 1,500 |
| 2025 employment | 27,700 | 20,100 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.