How the national numbers differ
1Computer Systems Analyst has the edge on projected growth
Computer Systems Analyst is at 7.9% projected growth, compared with -7.3% projected growth for Computer Programmers.
2Computer Systems Analyst has the edge on annual openings
Computer Systems Analyst is at 32,900 annual openings, compared with 4,400 annual openings for Computer Programmers.
3Computer Systems Analyst has the edge on median pay
Computer Systems Analyst is at $105,850, compared with $100,390 for Computer Programmers.
45.9/ 100Computer Programmers
vs
76.9/ 100Computer Systems Analyst
Each available metric is ranked from 0 to 100 against the careers on ChooseField. The weighted average uses this profile: pay 30%, growth 25%, openings 30%, preparation level 15%. Missing values are not scored as zero; their weights are redistributed across available metrics. Occupation size has zero weight: employment is not accessible vacancies. Preparation categories do not measure admission difficulty or years without earnings. The score summarizes national measures; local opportunities and personal fit still need separate consideration.
Detailed evidence
Computer Programmers vs Computer Systems Analyst
| Dimension | Computer Programmers | Computer Systems Analyst |
| Median pay (2025) | $100,390 | $105,850 |
| Pay percentile | 83.1 percentile | 86.4 percentile |
| Projected growth (2025–2035) | -7.3% | 7.9% |
| Annual openings (2025–2035) | 4,400 | 32,900 |
| 2025 employment | 110,800 | 544,400 |
| How you qualify | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree |
| O*NET preparation group | Job Zone 4 | Job Zone 4 |
| Related work experience | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. | No prior related occupation is typically required; employer requirements vary. |
| On-the-job training | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. | BLS does not list a separate on-the-job training requirement. Employers may still provide orientation and role-specific training. |
The table reports national benchmarks and reviewed work descriptions. It does not rate personal suitability, job security, or physical safety.